Our opinion on YOUTUBE
It’s almost always different from the opinion of the CROWD.
The crowd is the worst. Crowds can only be controlled by fear.
It is for crowd control that religion, the police and the army were invented.

A “mob” is a large, unruly, and often aggressive crowd of people who may gather spontaneously or intentionally for various reasons. Mobs can be dangerous due to their potential for violence, destruction of property, and the loss of individual reasoning and responsibility within the group. In a mob, individuals may act in ways they wouldn’t individually, often fueled by emotions like anger, fear, or excitement. Mobs can pose significant risks to public safety and order, making them a concern for law enforcement and society at large.

Differences in crowds between Europe and Russia may include cultural, social, and historical factors. Here are some potential distinctions:

1. Cultural Norms: Cultural norms and behaviors within a crowd can vary significantly. For example, the ways people express themselves, the level of politeness or aggression, and the use of personal space might differ between European and Russian crowds due to cultural differences.
2. Political Protests: The nature of political protests or demonstrations within crowds can vary. While both regions have seen political activism, the issues, demands, and strategies employed by protesters may differ.
3. Response to Authorities: Responses to law enforcement or authorities within crowds can vary. European countries may have different expectations and responses to police presence compared to Russia, influenced by historical experiences and the legal framework.
4. Historical Context: Historical events and experiences can shape the behavior and dynamics of crowds. For example, historical events like revolutions, conflicts, or social movements can leave a lasting impact on how crowds in each region mobilize and react.
5. Sociopolitical Climate: The current sociopolitical climate in each region can influence the behavior of crowds. Factors like government policies, media influence, and public sentiment may differ between Europe and Russia, leading to variations in crowd behavior.
6. Urban vs. Rural: Crowds in urban and rural settings may exhibit different characteristics. European countries tend to have a higher urbanization rate compared to Russia, potentially influencing the nature and size of crowds.
7. Communication and Technology: The use of communication tools and social media can impact crowd organization and mobilization. Differences in technology adoption and access can affect how crowds form and coordinate.

It’s important to note that these differences are generalizations, and there can be significant variations within each region. Crowds are complex social phenomena influenced by a wide range of factors, and individual behaviors within a crowd can vary widely regardless of geographical location.